Meanwhile the 7980XE only saw a 4% performance increase when testing with Linux. The last chess benchmark we're going to look at is Crafty and Interestingly, the Core i9-7980XE wins out here and saw the biggest performance uplift when moving to Linux, a 5% performance increase was seen.. Умный Кэш. Processor family. Intel® Core™ i9 7-го поколения. Cooler included. Нет. Processor model. i9-7980XE Intel Core i9-7980XE: 1999 USD!! Prosesor Intel yang satu ini menyandang gelar 'Extreme Edition', gelar tertinggi yang diberikan Intel pada prosesor mereka. Biasanya prosesor ini memiliki performa luar biasa tinggi, dan diikuti harga bombastis yang jelas tidak masuk kantong sebagian besar pengguna PC As you can see in the full details to the right, our testing system for X299 uses an Asus Prime X299-A motherboard, with 4x8GB of G.Skill DDR4-3200 CL14 memory. This is the same RAM I used with Threadripper, giving the CPUs every possible chance to excel. (I retested the earlier CPUs.) For graphics duties, I use the GTX 1080 Ti FE, giving the CPUs an opportunity to differentiate themselves. Finally, all storage consists of SSDs, with a separate (usually M.2) drive for the OS and applications, and a 2TB SATA SSD for games.
Please read: The 7980XE scores are listed above the chart only with the scores and no bar plot (totally weird when you look at it but yeah, it is what it is). « CoD: WWII Trailers - Meet the Squad · Core i9-7980XE 18-core Benchmarks · Intel Showcases 10nm Updates and 64-Layer NAND For.. Style: i9-7980XE ProcessorSize: ProcessorVerified Purchase. When we received the chip it was in an I9 box and it look official from Intel. But when we tried to put it into the motherboard, we noticed that all the code numbers had been buffed off and it was a complete counterfeit
tl;dr: Intel Core i9-7980XE und 7960X bieten im Test im Vergleich zum Konkurrenten AMD Ryzen Threadripper noch mehr Leistung, kosten mit bis zu 2.000 Euro aber auch viel mehr. Überraschen kann das Topmodell beim Overclocking: 4,6 GHz auf 18 Kernen waren möglich, bis in der Redaktion das.. Please read: The 7980XE scores are listed above the chart only with the scores and no bar plot (totally weird when you look at it but yeah, it is what it is). I9-7980Xe + X299 Designare Ex + Gtx Titan X Pascal Sli + Intel 750 1,2Tb | Build Your Own Pc. The Fastest Gaming Pc You Can Build Right Now. 9900K! + Benchmarks Just quickly, here’s a look at power consumption during the single-threaded workload. Intel’s lead is in the range of 17% in single-threaded scoring for Cinebench, with power consumption at around 70W stock. The i9-7980X should boost up to 4.4 GHz on two cores in Turbo Boost Max 3.0 and up to 4.2 GHz in Turbo Max 2.0. The 2000 USD 165 Watt part should be available soon. Below the tests, courtesy of Coolenjoy.
Especificaciones, valores de referencia, características, tecnología Intel®, comentarios, precios y dónde comprar el procesador Intel® Core™ i9-7980XE Extreme Edition After a few trial runs with liquid metal application and consultation with Der8auer and VSG, we eventually got the method down and improved thermals significantly. Delidding was done with the Delid DieMate X (we later learned that the vertical clamp is used for resealing, so is unnecessary to the delid process), after which process a cleaning of the IHS and die took place. We scraped off the silicone adhesive on the IHS-side to permit better contact and lower the copper plate closer to the die, leaving a thin layer of adhesive as a placement guide on the double-substrate Intel i9-7900X. Speaking with Der8auer, there is minimal thermal headroom to be gained by removing 100% of the silicone adhesive, and the delidding expert suggested that we leave a thin layer to better place the IHS. Going into these results, know that there is another 1-3C that could be gained from removing all the adhesive, according to Der8auer.The Core i9 7980XE was paired with an NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan Xp and compared against AMD's Ryzen 7 1800X and the Core i7 7700K running the game at a resolution of 2560x1440 in five different locations. The 7980XE delivered a framerate higher by anywhere from 20% to 150% at any given time compared to the 7700K and 1800X. Although this includes some maximum FPS spikes, on average the 7980XE delivered around 30% better performance overall. Don’t have an Intel account? Sign up here for a basic account. Replacing the TIM with liquid metal drives us down to 78 degrees Celsius, with the Kraken X62 liquid temperatures now at 45.5C. That’s a reduction of about 13-14C, for this particularly power-intensive test.
i9-9900KF (индекс=20361) Intel Core i9-9900KS (индекс=21479) Intel Core i9-9900X (индекс=22984) Intel Core i9-9920X (индекс=25170) Intel Core i9-9940X (индекс=27036) Intel Core i9-9960X (индекс=28250) Intel Core i9-9980XE (индекс=29582) Intel Pentium G4400 (индекс=3539) Intel.. Forgot your Intel username or password? Processor Number. i9-7980XE. Status. Discontinued I don’t usually spend a lot of time discussing the amount of power your PC can use, but even running stock the latest Core i9 models are pretty excessive. Nominally, they have a 165W TDP, but the chips I’ve tested all exceeded that mark by a large margin. That’s partly because the motherboard manufactures are playing fast and loose when it comes to honoring the official specifications from Intel, running at maximum Turbo multipliers rather than clocking down to the base clock when necessary to avoid going too far over TDP. Multiple boards won’t even run 'stock' properly—everything ends up slightly to moderately overclocked.
When creating your best work, you need the most responsive technology to handle multiple, CPU-intensive tasks at once. With an Intel® Core™ X-series processor family, you can edit your video, render 3D effects, and compose the soundtrack simultaneously without compromising your computer’s performance.Steve started GamersNexus back when it was just a cool name, and now it's grown into an expansive website with an overwhelming amount of features. He recalls his first difficult decision with GN's direction: "I didn't know whether or not I wanted 'Gamers' to have a possessive apostrophe -- I mean, grammatically it should, but I didn't like it in the name. It was ugly. I also had people who were typing apostrophes into the address bar - sigh. It made sense to just leave it as 'Gamers.'"
The AMD Threadripper 1950X stock CPU achieved a score of 3170.4 cb marks multithreaded and 165 single-threaded. The Intel i9-7960X stock CPU achieves a marginally better multithreaded score of 3190 points, but has a more significant single-threaded lead at 194 points. This isn’t a surprise, at this point. For all intents and purposes, the 7960X is functionally equivalent in multithreaded performance to the 1950X, with a less-than 1% performance lead. This sub-1% gain is at the cost of an additional 100W down the EPS12V rails.As you can probably guess, gaming performance isn’t one of the highlights of the 7980XE. Sure, it can run games well enough, but the i7-7700K is still the fastest gaming CPU in most cases. If that chip isn't enough for your particular workload—like maybe you’re doing CPU encoding of a livestream—I would suggest looking at the 6/8-core i7 parts, maybe Ryzen 7 (if you're not after maximum 1080p framerates), or wait for Intel’s Z370 platform and the i7-8700K.Spend more time creating and less time waiting. The Intel® Core™ X-series processor family can handle your most demanding workload. Upload and edit your 360˚ videos quickly and experience VR videos–all in stunning 4K. There are no limits to what you can create on your new computer. Intel Core i9-7980XE - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark und Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark-Ergebnisse. Der Blender Benchmark erstellt vordefinierte Szenen und misst dabei die Zeit (s) die für die komplette Szene benötigt wird. Je kürzer die benötigte Zeit, desto besser
We’re starting with Prime95 28.5 power torturing at 3.6GHz and 1.15VID fixed. The voltage ID is a bit higher than auto might output, but will ensure that all CPUs tested will remain stable, and means that voltage remains fixed. Auto voltage causes fluctuations that could invalidate results.. But there has been some pro-oc activities with that part. The benchmarks originate from Coolenjoy and have been performed on an ASUS APEX motherboard. It looks like the proc indeed boosts up to 4.2 GHz on the cores during Cinebench. 7960X & 7980XE Blender Benchmark. Our 4K animation scene renders in 15 minutes on the AMD 1950X Threadripper 16C CPU, in 22 minutes on Intel i9-7960X & 7980XE FireStrike Benchmarks. In terms of the resulting scores, 3DMark seems to hit a point of diminishing returns with the 7980XE
Overclocking the 7960X gets it to 11.1 minutes, but we’re at around 492W consumption at this point. That’s a render time reduction of 23% versus the stock 7960X – which is absolutely impressive and worthy of high praise, just looking at how much headroom exists – but it’s 23% time reduction at the cost of 125% more power. The praise sort of evaporates at this point, sadly. This is very much a Your Mileage May Vary area, as lower voltages can better stabilize these high frequencies, but that comes down to chip quality. Benchmark. Menü. Система Жёсткий диск (HDD). Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-7980XE CPU @ 2.60GHz. Mainboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X299 AORUS Gaming 9
So there you have it folks, as it turns out a two thousand dollar CPU is really fast, go figure. Whether it's worth that hefty price tag or not is subject to debate however. And as always, remember to take these numbers with a grain of salt until the full proper reviews are out. The NDA is expected to end next week on the 25th. Game benchmarks were a mix of built-in benchmarks that I found to be consistent enough for testing and timed runs using fraps (World of tanks). I managed to overclock the Core i9-9980XE to 4.5GHz, which is the same as I managed with the Core i9-7980XE, albeit with slightly less voltage at 1.15V..
The 7960X in its stock configuration with TIM and additional silicone adhesive lands at 93 degrees Celsius, with liquid temperature nearing Asetek’s maximum spec of 60C. This is the most concerning and, from the standpoint of getting Intel to act on its poor thermal solution, is the most powerful: OEMs and SIs like Dell, Alienware, iBUYPOWER, and CyberPower rely on Asetek for affordable CLC solutions for workstations and HEDT platforms. The fact that we’re nearing the 60C maximum operating liquid temperature on an open air bench means that, under heavier working conditions and with mere 240-280mm CLCs, we’d be nearly at or breaching the 60C threshold when in a case. This may result in some behind-the-scenes politicking between Intel and their OEM partners in the future.The 7-Zip benchmark is is a purely multi-threaded test, although there are two components to it to evaluate compression and decompression performance. Compression tends to favor Intel, while decompression tends to favor AMD. The scores above fall in line with the figures we would normally see in the combined test, which includes both compression and decompression. Here, the i9 7980XE outperforms the Threadripper flagship by no less than 30%.Frankly, even if you’re doing a lot of 'real work' besides playing games, there’s very little that most people do where they would need an 18-core/36-thread (18C/36T) processor. All the usual suspects are of course still applicable—video editing, 3D rendering, compiling code, and other professional applications can all benefit from having more CPU cores. But even though these can make use of additional cores, is there really any benefit to having 18 cores? Going from 2 to 4 cores is an easy sell, and doubling again from 4 to 8 can also pay dividends. Doubling yet again to go from 8 to 16 cores, and then adding two more for good measure to get to 18? Yeah, not so much. This becomes even clearer when you consider other factors. 1 Best headphones for gaming 2020 2 Best curved monitors for gaming 3 Best gaming chairs 4 Best NVMe SSD 5 The best CPU for gaming 1 HyperX x Ducky One 2 Mini gaming keyboard review 2 AMD Ryzen 3 3100 CPU review 3 Super Mega Baseball 3 review 4 NZXT H1 PC case review 5 Before We Leave review PC Gamer is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.
With the overclock in place, the i9-7980XE ekes out a small overall lead in gaming performance compared to an overclocked i7-7700K. If you have multiple high-end graphics cards, like GTX 1080 Ti or Titan Xp, the additional PCIe lanes offered by Core i9 processors can also help, particularly at 4K resolution, but there are enough major games where SLI/CrossFire fail to work that multi-GPU increasingly feels like a poor solution to gaming performance.Intel's HCC based Skylake X parts will officially launch next week on the 25th of September. These include the 14 core i9 7940X, 16 core i9 7960X and 18 core i9 7980XE. Although as is always the case with these launches, someone somewhere out there managed to get their hands on Intel's big daddy chip early and proceeded to benchmark the snot out of it and we've got the numbers for you.The Intel® Core™ X-series processor family is unlocked to provide additional headroom. New features include the ability to overclock each core individually, AVX ratio controls for more stability, and VccU voltage control for extreme scenarios. Combined with tools like Intel® Extreme Tuning Utility (Intel® XTU) and Intel® Extreme Memory Profile (Intel® XMP), you have a powerful kit for maximizing performance.
.to/38URdHc EVGA 850W PSU purchase link: ▶ amzn.to/38U7Dzi ASUS PG279Q Monitor purchase link ▶ amzn.to/38YpZ2i #Intel #Benchmark #Cpu #PChardware #Tech #PC The Core i9-7980XE lives up to its Extreme Edition lineage with an eye-popping $1999 sticker price, and the Core i9-7960X isn't far behind at $1699. As always, we did our best to deliver clean benchmarking numbers. We ran each benchmark at least three times and took the median of those.. (Note: I dropped Total War: Warhammer from the CPU benchmarks list because the built-in benchmark was recently updated, making all previous results useless. I didn't have time to retest all the CPUs, but I'll likely move to Total War: Warhammer 2 for future CPU reviews.)
Der Intel Core i9-9980XE Extreme Edition ist der teuerste Prozessor, den sich Heimanwender derzeit zulegen können. Mit 18 Kernen und enorm hohen Taktraten verspricht er enorm viel Power. An die Spitze unserer Bestenliste schafft es der Core i9 dennoch nicht ganz Account Sign Up Log In Intel Core i9-7980XE Benchmarks Benchmark results for the Intel Core i9-7980XE can be found below. The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser.With that out of the way, I’m going to focus the remainder of this review primarily on the performance of the Core i9-7980XE. I've highlighted both the stock and overclocked results in the charts, and you can compare it with the i9-7960X and other CPUs, including an overclocked i7-7700K. Make no mistake—they new Core i9 CPUs are fast, besting even AMD’s Threadripper parts. But could anything possibly warrant the price Intel is asking? For gamers, the answer is a resounding no.Different motherboards might change the equation, but power draw is still going to be way up there. I had the best luck with using the 'Auto' CPU voltage setting on the Asus board, which appeared to range from 0.8V up to 1.25V on the various cores depending on CPU load. Trying for a static 1.2V didn't work (Windows failed to boot), though giving a 0.05V offset voltage did seem to help in some cases. Basically, Intel has binned Skylake-X to get the best CPU dies for the i9-7980XE, and higher voltages are going to push temperatures and power draw into the red zone.
But there’s little reason for anyone to buy this chip for their next PC, other than pure bragging rights. 10 years from now, maybe chips like this will be commonplace, but today? No. Especially if your primary purpose in owning a PC is for playing games, something we wholeheartedly support at PC Gamer. All of your gaming needs can be met on a much less expensive PC without ever running into problems—and at this price, you could potentially build two or even three complete PCs for less than the cost of just the processor.Using Blender next and overclocking the CPUs, we land the 7960X at 4.6GHz with a 1.22VID, and are forced to use a 360mm Thermaltake Floe radiator with 3x Corsair magnetic levitation fans in order to prevent throttling. With the 360mm radiator and 60dBA worth of maglev fans, the 7960X with TIM operates at around 85C. Liquid metal and the 280mm radiator – which uses much worse fans, mind you – even manages to outperform the TIM and 360mm radiator on the stock CPU. This alone is enough reason for Intel to consider better alternatives. A quieter, smaller cooler is achieving better thermals when using superior interface material. Using the 360mm Thermaltake Floe radiator and Corsair fans with a liquid metal application, we’re at 76-77C, a reduction of about 9 degrees from the TIM and 360 solution. PassMark Software - PC Benchmarks - Over 800,000 CPUs and 1,000 models benchmarked and compared in graph form, updated daily! Intel Core i9-7980XE. ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME 9610.2
Geekbench 5 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000 (which is the score of an Intel Core i3-8100). Higher scores are better, with double the score indicating double the performance.Looking at the individual games, Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation is the only clear winner for many-core CPUs, with the 7980XE beating the 7700K by 20 percent. Dishonored 2 gives a 10 percent lead to the 7980XE, and Hitman an eight percent lead, but everywhere else it's a tie or slightly worse. On the other side of the scale, Dawn of War 3 shows a 20 percent performance advantage for the 7700K, and Far Cry: Primal gives a 12 percent lead. Far Cry is a bit of a special case, however, as it refuses to run if you have more than 20 total CPU thread—I had to disable eight of the 7980XE's CPU cores to get the game to run at all, similar to what I had to do on Threadripper.Above are the official Turbo Boost 2.0 frequencies for Intel's X299 CPUs. (Turbo Boost Max 3.0 allows 2-core loads to go 200MHz higher on the Core i9 parts.) If you look at the i9-7960X, which I've covered in a separate review, the i9-7980XE adds 12.5 percent more cores, but it costs 17.6 percent more. It's also running all 18 cores 5.6 percent slower than the 7960X runs its 16 cores, meaning the best-case difference in performance is going to be more like 6 percent. In practice, there are many situations where the difference will be even smaller—the law of diminishing returns is in full effect. Intel started Intel Core i9-7980XE sales 1 September 2017 at a recommended price of $1,999. This is Skylake (server) architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at home systems. It provides good benchmark performance at 36.21 percent of a leader's which is AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Comparatively, the AMD Threadripper 1950X CPU consumed about 144W in the same test. We saw the 1920X plot around the same, with a 145W throughput. Overclocking the 1950X landed it at 274W, though we only ever achieved a 4.0GHz overclock in initial testing, so it wasn’t really worthwhile.The Core i9-7980XE is the fastest consumer CPU Intel has ever released, and you don't need it. I’ve been around the computer industry a long time, and I’ve tested everything from $50 to $1200 graphics cards—sometimes multiple cards. I’ve tested a lot of processors as well, from $50 ultra-budget models to $1000 extreme chips. And while the i7-6850X came close, this is the first time I’ve ever personally laid hands on a $2000 chip. (Okay, $1979 officially, but close enough.)
It has taken Intel a little longer to roll out its higher core count Skylake X parts based on the HCC -- High Core Count -- Xeon die, which many have speculated were never actually planned for the desktop although AMD's Ryzen Threadripper launch has seemingly forced Intel's hand. After all, the i9 7980XE's only job is to dethrone AMD's 1950X which is currently the most powerful desktop processor you can buy. The Core i9 7980XE also only happens to feature two more cores than AMD's 1950X, go figure.Our 4K animation scene renders in 15 minutes on the AMD 1950X Threadripper 16C CPU, in 22 minutes on the stock 7900X (or 18 minutes when overclocked), and in 14 minutes on the 7960X. Let’s focus on the 14-minute 7960X time and 15-minute 1950X time, for now. The 1950X requires 144W power during this render, with the 7960X requiring 218W – that’s an increase of about 74W, or around a 50% increase in power for a 5.9% decrease in render time required. Although some studios might reasonably argue that the speed benefit outstrips the power requirement, as animators can now get more done, we see this as an increasingly difficult argument when requiring 50% more power for such gains.The last synthetic test we have is 3DMark Fire Strike and naturally we're only looking at the physics scores since we're talking about CPUs and not GPUs. The Core i9 7980XE scores 32 thousand points, the highest score we've seen from any desktop processor ever, earning it a 17% lead over AMD's flagship. Spesifikasi, benchmark, fitur, teknologi Intel®, ulasan, harga, dan tempat pembelian prosesor Intel® Core™ i9-7980XE Extreme Edition The 7980XE, meanwhile, completes the render in 13.3 minutes stock, or 10.1 minutes when overclocked. These speeds make the 7960X far more desirable than the 7980XE in this task, given its price point and relatively equivalent Blender performance. Again, though, we must consider the 1950X. For folks not GPU-accelerating their renders, or for anyone who has a specific scene that renders better on CPUs, the 1950X offers a better balance of power and thermals in exchange for its still-fast render times. If you want the fastest and just don’t care about anything else, including cost or power – which is factored into cost – well, looks like you’ve got a new fastest CPU to consider. It’s just not a balanced victory by Intel, but it is a victory. We have to give credit for the tremendous OC headroom, but also must take some away by pointing out the architecture’s scaling inefficiency as clocks increase.
The Core i9-7980XE is the most expensive CPU in Intel's X299 lineup. It's not available to buy just yet but it seems some have managed to get their hands on early samples. An enthusiast known as Coolenjoy (via Videocardz) has posted benchmarks for the 7980XE this week.. But again, it’s at the cost of 500W down the EPS12V cables, upwards of 615W, in some tests. It’s also at the cost of $700 more than a Threadripper 1950X CPU. If you’re the type to genuinely overclock a CPU and leave it at the upper-end of its clocks and performance, the i9-7960X runs away from the TR 1950X. If you’re the type to use a CPU stock, well, depending on the test, the TR 1950X may be a better value for money. This even applies to the type who might not care about initial cost: We’re talking single-digit percentages in some cases, but for significantly more power consumed. Overclocking is a different story, as is Premiere. Our Premiere benchmark is a major shining light for the CPU (but also shows the 7980XE as producing diminishing returns), roughly halving the render time with CUDA from the 1950X results we have. But this is also heavily project-oriented, and our project is not representative of all performance in Premiere. Please keep that in mind. Intel schlägt zurück: Lange lässt man AMD nicht die Benchmarks anführen, sondern kontert mit einem 16- und 18-Kerner dem Ryzen Threadripper. Lange darf AMD den Platz an der Sonne nicht für sich beanspruchen: Nach etwas über einem Monat kontert Intel mit dem Core i9-7980XE und dem Core.. As the Cinebench Benchmark tests the Multi-Core Performance as well as the Performance of a single core (usually under Turbo-Boost), it is a great Benchmark for finding the best Processors for your needs. Intel i9 7980XE. 18. 2.6 The 7980XE plots at 90 degress Celsius with its stock configuration, with the liquid metal variant brought down to 72-73C. This reduction is particularly massive, measuring in at about a 17C drop in averaged CPU core thermals by switching to a better thermal solution on the package.
The Intel Core i9-7980XE 'Extreme' processor is the answer to that challenge and is the highe... Intel's fastest ever consumer CPU tops the benchmark charts, but it's not worth the cost... Before we reach for our thesaurus in an attempt to describe the performance of the i9-7980XE in sufficiently.. The 7980XE topped out at 4.2GHz one-core Turbo, whereas the 9980XE bumps that to 4.4GHz. Likewise, the Turbo Boost Max (best core) peak A chess engine benchmark has got to be about as niche as it can get, but the fact is, they've been inherently designed to scale like crazy, and we see a..
We've got two batches of benches for you, focused around productivity and gaming. The benchmarks are courtesy of coolenjoy.com and picked up via VCZ. Visit Website It’s cool that you can still hit 4.1 GHz on 18 cores, and with additional cooling I’m sure you could push things further. But you would need more than just additional cooling—like some seriously beefy power delivery to your CPU.
The browser version you are using is not recommended for this site.Please consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser by clicking one of the following links. Core i9 7980XE used in other benchmarks. Benchmark. Comments on Core i9 7980XE. Please log in or register to comment. Official partners Overclocked to 4.6GHz, the 7960X boosts its score over stock by 25% -- again, impressive and significant headroom – in exchange for its additional power consumption of around 240W. This 25% performance lead is equivalent to the gain over the 1950X. The 7980XE hits 3388 points multithreaded, leading the stock 7960X by 6.2% -- not hugely worthwhile, for most users. When overclocked to 4.5GHz, the 7980XE manages 4398 points.
Intel does manage to definitively claim the highest performing slots in our benchmarks, but also manages to claim the award for consuming the most power, using the worst stock thermal solution, and requiring more money to be spent on CLCs or high-end coolers. Where the company gains single to low double-digit percentage performance jaunts, it also gains triple-digit power consumption increases. Overclocking headroom is tremendous, making the Intel i9-7960X a serious enthusiast option and a lot of fun to work with, but it does require modifications to truly tap into performance. Yes, 4.6GHz overclocks can be achieved stock – but not easily, and often with loud cooling solutions. With liquid metal, we dropped those cooler requirements down to 280mm X62 units with reasonable noise levels. With LM, we were pushing 4.7GHz to 4.8GHz on 1.24-1.25VID, reaping remarkable performance leaps of ~25-30% over stock. That’s impressive. The i9 7980XE CPU manages to keep a 30% lead against AMD's Threadripper 1950X throughout synthetic and gaming benchmarks. The same South Korean who leaked some initial i9 7980XE performance results around three weeks ago, have recently revealed more detailed benchmark.. The Core i9-7980XE Extreme Edition is, without argument, a stunning performer for tasks that consume as many cores and threads as you can throw at them, such as video editing. Last, we fired up the popular 7-Zip file-compression software and ran its built-in compression/decompression benchmark.. Moving on to CInebench r15, a favorite of AMD's. Here the 7980XE matches its other Skylake X siblings in single-threaded performance but delivers nearly double the multi-threaded performance of the 10 core 7900X and outperforms AMD's 1950X by nearly 37%.
Our 7900X delidding benchmarks weren’t published by coincidence: Today, we’re expanding on our liquid metal vs. Intel TIM testing with the new Intel i9-7960X and i9-7980XE CPUs, the 16C and 18C Skylake-X parts, respectively. These CPUs are Intel’s highest multithreaded performers in this segment, and are priced alongside that status – the 7960X costs $1700, with the 7980XE at $2000.Will AMD eventually counter with a 24C/48T Threadripper, or go whole-hog on a 32C/64T rebadged Epyc processor? Then Intel can counter with it's even more ludicrous 28-core parts! Part of me wants that to happen, but the practical side of me just sadly shakes my head. The bickering and one-upmanship is getting a bit silly. But if you want the absolute fastest CPU around, right now that crown belongs to the i9-7980XE. And you still don't need one. and compared in graph form - New benchmarks are added daily! Hard Drive Benchmarks Learn More Flip over to the gaming side of things and the i9-7980XE becomes even more specious. There's effectively no overall improvement in game performance when moving beyond the i7-7700K—individual games might run a bit faster on the i9-7980XE, others faster on the i7-7700K, but it's a net wash. But you get all that for only six times the price! If you want more than a 4C/8T Intel CPU for gaming, I'd strongly recommend the i7-7800X as the more sensible alternative, or wait for the i7-8700K which will arrive next month. Intel® Core™ X Serisi İşlemci Ailesi. Intel® Core™ i9-7980XE Extreme Edition Processor. İşlemci Numarası. i9-7980XE. Durum. Discontinued
For our standardized Blender test, we were measuring power consumption of 218W with the i9-7960X 16C/32T CPU at stock settings, or 492W when overclocked to 4.6GHz with a 1.22VID. That’s 40A down the EPS12V cables, at that point. We measured about 214W for the stock 7980XE – within usual variance of the 7960X – and also measured nearly 500W with the 4.5GHz overclock. Now, of course, how worthwhile this tradeoff is depends heavily on the actual performance improvement – we’ll get to that next.There are additionally two Kaby Lake-X chips (i5-7640X and i7-7740X) that will run on X299, but only with dual-channel memory and 16 PCIe lanes. These are nothing more than tweaked variants of the LGA1151 Kaby Lake chips, with slightly higher clockspeeds and power draw, the idea being you could start with a 'budget' chip on Intel's enthusiast platform, and later upgrade to a faster chip with more cores. There are a few other minor benefits, but X299 is a bit of a confusing mess and you'll want to pay careful attention to your motherboard manual in regards to expansion slots if you're using a KBL-X chip.Starting first with CPU-only performance, the 7960X at 4.6GHz impressively completes the render in 33.6 minutes, for a time reduction of 22% versus the stock 7960X time of 43 minutes. The 7980XE is much less exciting, completing its render in effectively the same time as the 7960X. This is the trouble with Premiere: The software, like FireStrike, has some unique requirements. It wants frequency, but it also wants cores – but not too many, otherwise they won’t be engaged. CPU Intel Core i9, Intel® Core™ i9-7980XE, CPU Intel® Core™ i9-7980XE X-series Processor (24.75M Cache, up to 4.20 GHz) LGA 2066 - đột phá về công nghệ Szczegółowe wyniki testów i specyfikacja Intel Core i9 7980XE. Sprawdź dokładne dane lub porównaj z innymi produktami. Ocena benchmark.pl. Oceny cząstkowe w poszczególnych kategoriach oraz ocena końcowa
Video Card Benchmarks - Over 1,000,000 Video Cards and 3,900 Models Benchmarked and compared in graph form - This page contains a graph which includes benchmark results for high end Video Cards - such as recently released ATI and nVidia video cards using the PCI-Express standard Intel Core i9-7980XE Processor Processor review with benchmark scores. See how it compares with other popular models. Thinking about upgrading? Find out how your PC compares with the Intel Core i9-7980XE Processor with 3DMark, the Gamer's Benchmark
Yukarıdaki görsele baktığımızda bizi heyecanlandıran işlemci doğal olarak Core i9-7980XE oluyor. Zira bu işlemci 18 çekirdeğe ve 36 mantıksal çekirdeğe Öte yandan işlemcinin tükettiği güç değeri de takdir edersiniz ki oldukça yüksek: 165W. Fiyatı da 1999$ olarak belirlenen Core i9-7980XE modelinin.. Benchmark results for the Intel Core i9-7980XE can be found below. The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser. Geekbench 5 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000 (which is the score of an Intel Core i3-8100) From a non-gaming perspective, this is a questionable processor—it's only marginally faster than the 16C/32T i9-7960X. You can make an argument for something like the i9-7900X, where there's a sizeable jump in performance from the i7-7700K (sometimes over twice as fast), but beyond that scaling with core counts really starts to slow down. The extra eight cores end up improving overall performance in CPU-intensive applications by around 30 percent, which might sound good, but the six extra cores on the i9-7960X gives a similar 27 percent performance improvement. (I haven't had a chance to test the i9-7920X or i9-7940X, which would obviously fill in the gap.)AMD AM4 Testbed Gigabyte Aorus X370 Gaming 5 16GB GeIL Evo X DDR4-3200 CL16 Samsung 960 Evo 500GB Enermax Ostrog Lite Enermax Platimax 750W
As we’ve already covered the 7900X results in a standalone content piece, we’ll focus on the 7960X and 7980XE. Rather than focusing entirely on delidding and thermal benchmarks, we’ll also be including power testing and some production benchmarks (Blender, Premiere). This review of the Intel i9-7960X and i9-7980XE will primarily test thermals, power, delidded thermals, liquid metal thermals, rendering benchmarks, and some synthetics. The Intel Core i9-7980XE demolished all of our benchmarks, scoring an incredible 3,331 points in CineBench's multi-threaded benchmark (100 points less than an overclocked Threadripper 1950X), and a staggering 184 points in the single-threaded operation
Let’s run through a final benchmark before concluding. With Adobe Premiere, we saw the following rendering performance metrics. This processor has scored 27854 benchmark points. View charts to compare Intel Core i9-7980XE 4.2 GHz CPU (released 2017) to other popular We've benchmarked 199 CPU units to provide a trusted benchmark score for this Intel's 18-core processor. Intel Core i9-7980XE @ 2.60GHz was released in.. Intel'in AMD'nin Ryzen Threadripper atağına karşılık olarak tasarladığı Core i9 işlemcilerinin tepe modelinin ilk benchmark sonuçları geldi. Ama ulan 7980XE ile 1950X'i kıyaslamak neyin kafasıdır ha neyin?! Gidin 1998X alın, onunla kıyaslayın ulan 7980XE bulan adam 1998X nasıl bulamıyor
Intel X299 Testbed Asus Prime X299-A 32GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 CL14 Samsung 960 Pro 512GB Open Bench Table Seasonic Prime 1000W MEG Z390 GODLIKE. i9 9900KS World Record => 7478 MHz. X299 XPOWER GAMING AC. i9-7980XE World Record => 6140.46 MHz No one should be surprised by the results for the Core i9-7980XE. Given it uses a slightly tweaked version of the 14nm lithography found in the previous generation i7-6950X, power use was always going to be a factor. If you're in the niche market where you want as many CPU cores as possible, running at the highest clockspeeds possible, this is the new champion in the World's Fastest CPU competition, but it comes with some serious caveats, not least of which is the price.Something else to consider is Intel's plans to release its i7-8700K and 300-series mainstream 'Coffee Lake' parts in the near future. The i7-8700K will cost less than $400, so you could buy three of them for under $1200, hit substantially higher clockspeeds, and still have money left over for the additional motherboards and memory you would need. Three PCs for the price of one! And I’m not even sure you would actually end up using much more power going that route.
It’s hard to outright recommend either of these two CPUs. There are places where they’re good, and the above data should help you determine whether that fits your needs. There are also places where they’re woefully power inefficient compared to nearby rival Threadripper, which also must factor into the decision. AMDの「Ryzen Threadripper 1950X」を駆逐するために、インテルが急いで作った対抗CPUが18コア搭載「Core i9 7980XE」だ。1999ドルという馬鹿高い価格に見合った処理性能を持っているのか。各種ベンチマ..
Here's the trick, though: The temperatures are actually much worse than what's averaged for the 7980XE, as we were hitting TjMax on some cores. The Prime95 benchmark turned into a runaway power/thermal scenario that eventually tripped OCP at 50A. Some cores were hitting 104-105C, which caused thermal throttling. Here's a look at that: The Core i9-7980XE is the fastest consumer CPU Intel has ever released, and you don't need it. I've been around the computer industry a long time, and (Note: I dropped Total War: Warhammer from the CPU benchmarks list because the built-in benchmark was recently updated, making all previous.. Skvělý výkon: Intel i9-7980XE. Firma Intel na trh uvedla moderní řadu x86 čipů z rodiny Core X, které vyžadují sadu X299 a patici LGA 2066. Platforma může hostit celou škálu procesorů s písmenem X ve znaku, v tomto případě jde však o emblém XE, který znači extrémní výkon Power blends well with thermals, so we’ll look at those next. Unless otherwise noted, all of our power tests thus far and into the next section are taken at the rails. We clamp the EPS12V cables to get these numbers.
To get 4.1-4.7GHz 'benchmark stable,' I ramped up fan speed on the Corsair H115i AIO CPU cooler to near maximum (which is pretty loud), the pump is running full speed, and still the CPU gets close to 100C under heavy loads. In other words, this isn't really what I consider a safe overclock for 24/7 use, and I would say 3.9GHz on all cores is a better limit. I also had to use a -4 AVX/AVX512 offset on the multiplier, as otherwise the system would hard reset—it was probably drawing too much power from the VRMs.We’ve benchmarked 199 CPU units to provide a trusted benchmark score for this Intel’s 18-core processor. Intel Core i9-7980XE @ 2.60GHz was released in 2017 and supports FCLGA2066 socket. We compare the Intel Core i9-9900K with the Intel Core i9-7980XE with a wide selection of benchmark tools and data to help you choose the right processor, for your computing needs. Intel Core i9-7980XE. 126%. Relative performance The following is a list of Intel Core i9 brand microprocessors, for LGA 2066 chips also known as Intel Core X-series processors. They were introduced in May 2017. With their high number of cores, high power draw, high thermal output, and high performance, they are intended to be used by enthusiasts
We benchmark RTX 2080 Ti and i9-7980XE at Ultra Quality settings in 48 games and in 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. With a review of specifications, price, power RTX 2080 Ti with i9-7980XE 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality. In terms of cost, pricing clearly is a genuine issue here.. Intel LGA1151 Testbed MSI Z270 Gaming M7 16GB GeIL Evo X DDR4-3200 CL16 Samsung 960 Evo 500GB Corsair Carbide Air 740 Corsair HX750i 750W
either get the 7980xe or wait for the ryzen 9 3950x (assuming quad channel memory isnt a requirement for you). Given the lack of any third-party benchmarks, I don't know that, and neither, I suspect, do you. 7980xe then if you don't have plan to overclock We’ve finally started hitting performance levels in CPUs where our Premiere AVCHD 1080p60 project picking up performance with CUDA, but that’s not the focus of our tests and never has been. We’ve typically only included CUDA results to demonstrate that CPU performance becomes insignificant as production is accelerated with GPUs, but we’re seeing the 1950X, 7960X, and 7980XE breaking the previous 20-minute barrier with CUDA.We have additional power metrics for these new CPUs, but can’t publish all of them: Prime95 trips OCP in some instances, as the CPUs will ramp in power cycles (as normally) from 27A to about 43A, but then suddenly spike to >50A down the EPS12V cables. In these instances, because current can jump from ~27A to 50A nearly instantly, OCP triggers and the system shuts down. 50A translates to about 615W when we’re overclocked to 4.5GHz all core on the 7980XE or 4.6GHz on the 7960X. This seems to be a Prime-specific issue; other software will draw similar current, but doesn’t double instantaneously. We’re still looking into this. Famille de processeurs Intel® Core™ série X. Processeur Intel® Core™ i9-7980XE Extreme Edition. Processeurs Intel® Core™ série X. N° du processeur. i9-7980XE The Core i9 7980XE could work out fine with air cooling when using the Noctua NH-D9L and four fans within the Rosewill 4U server chassis. All of these benchmarks were facilitated in a fully-automated and standardized manner using the open-source Phoronix Test Suite benchmarking software